Articles Posted in Miscellaneous Crimes

| by

Joshua Medeiros and Kimberly Vasconcellos had been watched by police for several months after neighbors complained about suspicious activity at their Somerset, Massachusetts home. The officers set up surveillance and confirmed the neighbor’s complaints. They observed a pattern of cars pulling up to the home, someone entering the home and leaving after a short visit. Police also witnessed Medeiros meet with people just a short walk from the home and behind a neighboring school. They were able to set up a successful “controlled buy” with the help of an informant. With that information a search warrant was authorized. The search of the property yielded heroin, marijuana, marijuana plants and assorted drug possession and distribution paraphernalia. The couple has been charged with Conspiracy, Possession With Intent to Distribute Heroin and Marijuana, Possession of Drug Paraphernalia and Violation of the Massachusetts School Zone laws. Charges are now pending in the Fall River District Court.

Read Article:

Search of Home in Somerset Leads Cops To Pot Plants, Drug Paraphernalia, Massachusetts Couple Charged

So what happens to Medeiros and Vasconcellos now? As with most drug cases the initial focus of the defense will be on the validity of the search warrant. There will likely be a challenge to the issuance of the warrant based on either the absence of probable cause in the supporting affidavit or the integrity of the facts stated in the supporting affidavit. If the challenge is unsuccessful the defense then might center on the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the charges against one or both defendants. Factors to consider are the relationship between the defendants, the location of the drugs found in the home, the defendant’s habits as drug users, if any and more.

Continue Reading

| by

Devin Joseph Sheehan-Powers of Boston was indicted by an Essex County Grand Jury last week following his arrest for a July 15, 2009 incident. According to reports Sheehan-Powers was observed by Lynn Police chasing down a disabled man while brandishing a knife. Law enforcement officers saw Sheehan-Powers then punch the victim in the face and steal his cell phone. The attack was described as brutal. The officers who witnessed the incident chased the defendant and were able to apprehend him shortly after observing the crime. He was found in possession of the knife and crack cocaine. Bail in the case has been set at ten thousand dollars. The case will now be transferred from the Lynn District Court to the Salem Superior Court. Sheehan-Powers has formally been charged with armed robbery, possession of cocaine, assault and battery with a dangerous weapon causing serious bodily injury, aggravated assault and battery, mayhem and resisting arrest.

Read Article:

Boston Man Charged With Assortment Of Violent Crimes, Drug Possession After Assault On Winthrop Man

The crime of mayhem in Massachusetts is proscribed by Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 265 Section 14. The law states that the prosecution must prove that the defendant had the malicious intent to maim or disfigure the victim and that with that intent he “cuts out or maims the tongue, puts out or destroys an eye, cuts or tears off an ear, cuts, slits or mutilates the nose or lip, or cuts off or disables a limb or member, of another person”. Alternatively the prosecution can obtain a conviction for this crime if it proves beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant, possessing the intent to “maim or disfigure, assaults another person with a dangerous weapon, substance or chemical, and by such assault disfigures, cripples or inflicts serious or permanent physical injury upon such person”. A conviction of this crime carries a potential twenty year state prison sentence. The article suggests that the prosecution in this case will be proceeding under the second theory given the victim needed eye surgery at a Boston hospital.

Continue Reading

| by

Last week Mark Snow of Rockland, Massachusetts was arrested for crimes that occurred earlier in the summer. He was charged with Breaking and Entering, Threatening to Commit a Crime, Malicious Destruction to Property and Assault. As to that case the prosecution alleged that Snow entered a home without permission, threw a rock through the window and threatened the occupant. Snow was released on those charges. Then, on September 12, 2009 he was arrested for Kidnapping. It was reported that a twenty four year old woman called the police to report that Snow unlawfully entered her apartment, assaulted her and confined her to her home. The woman stated that the incident occurred four hours prior to her making the call to the police. He is being held without bail at the Plymouth County House of Correction. Other charges Snow faces from the second incident are domestic assault and battery, assault and battery with a dangerous weapon, breaking and entering, threats and witness intimidation.

Read Article:

Massachusetts Man Arrested For Kidnapping Just Days After Being Charged With Assortment Of Violent Crimes

If the details of the article are accurate it seems strange that the woman would wait four hours to report a crimes as violent as this one appears. Violent crimes in Massachusetts are usually reported right away. When I am defending home invasion or breaking and entering cases almost every initial complaint is made by a 911 call either during or shortly after the event. Extensive delays in reporting without a valid excuse raise a red flag. Why did the victim wait to report the crime? Often times the reasons for the delay disclose an illicit motive for making an unfounded complaint in the first place. This provides Massachusetts Criminal Attorneys with viable defenses to the charges. It would not surprise me to see the second case against Snow resolved in the Hingham District Court.

Continue Reading

| by

Adolfo Bonilla and Josue Ramirez-Gonzalez both from Waltham, Massachusetts had been banned from a local bar. They tried to gain entry and when they were denied both threatened to return with a gun and shoot and beat the owner. The police were immediately called. When they arrived Bonilla allegedly drove the car directly at the responding police car. The car stopped. Both suspects got out of the car and tried to flee and ended up struggling with the police. Ramirez-Gonzalez was charged with Malicious Destruction to Property for throwing a rock at a parked car as well as resisting arrest. Bonilla was charged with Resisting Arrest, various Motor Vehicle Crimes, Threatening to Commit a Crime and Assault with a Dangerous Weapon. The case is being prosecuted in the Waltham District Court.

Read Article:

Waltham, Massachusetts Men Kicked Out Of Bar Threaten Owner, Get Arrested For Several Criminal Charges

Threatening to commit a crime is a violation of Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 275 Section 2. The law makes clear that a conviction for the offense has a maximum sentence of six months in jail and a one hundred dollar fine. The irony in this case is that the bar owner was most probably scared by the threats yet this is the least of the defendant’s problems. The malicious destruction to property charge is more serious particularly if the value of the property is two hundred fifty dollars or more. In that case the crime is a felony.

Continue Reading

| by

A twenty one year old woman was sitting on her porch late last week when Pamphra Mulondo of Framingham, Massachusetts rode his bike by home. He stopped, pulled down his fly and fondled himself for two minutes. The woman then walked to a local drug store and saw Mulondo again. She became nervous and asked store employees to contact the police. The defendant was arrested and charged with open and gross lewdness and disorderly person. The case is pending in the Framingham District Court.

Read Article:

Framingham Man Charged With Sex Crime After Fondling Himself In Front Of Woman

Open and gross lewdness in Massachusetts is a felony proscribed by Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 272 Section 16. A conviction of this offense carries a possible three year state prison sentence or a two year house of correction sentence if the district attorney chooses to prosecute the case in the district court. This crime requires the district attorney to prove that the defendant intentionally, indecently and offensively exposed himself in such a way as to produce alarm. To convict someone of this crime a jury must be convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant acted in such a way as to alarm or shock. Here, the actions of the defendant appear to satisfy the elements of this offense. If he does not have a criminal record a good lawyer should be able to get this matter continued without a finding.

Continue Reading

| by

This past Monday night Malden, Massachusetts police stopped a car that had been reported stolen in Brockton. After removing a passenger from the car the driver struck two police officers with his vehicle and pinned another officer against a parked vehicle. Two suspects, James Calo of Malden and Mark Dwyer of Framingham were arrested. A third suspect, Alexander Nesom was shot and killed by police officers. Dwyer initially evaded apprehension but was caught less than twelve hours later. When the police were able to stop the vehicle they found four bags of heroin on Calo. Charges of receiving motor vehicle and possession with the intent to distribute heroin are pending in the Malden District Court.

Read Article:

Shooting Suspects Arrested And Arraigned In Malden District Court

One charge not mentioned in the article that I would think would issue is assault with the intent to murder. If the driver of the car deliberately drove into the three police officers he hit he can be charged with this crime. Assault with the intent to murder is a crime pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 265 Section 18. This crime is a felony and is punishable by up to twenty years on state prison. This crime must be prosecuted in the Superior Court. To prove armed assault with the intent to murder the government must proved beyond a reasonable that the defendants 1) committed an assault; 2) having a specific intent to kill the victim; and 3) that they did so acting with malice, which is defined as an absence of justification or mitigation. In cases such as this one the driver defends these charges by presenting evidence that he never intended to strike the officers with the vehicle, rather that he was trying to make his escape. The passenger’s defense will embrace his lack of knowledge as to the actions that driver ultimately took.

Continue Reading

| by

Just the other day a joint drug task force executed a search warrant at 43 Union Street in Southbridge, Massachusetts. Present at the time were Santos Sanchez and Yasmin Torres. Sanchez had outstanding federal warrants in other jurisdictions. During the execution of the search warrant law enforcement personnel found twenty two grams of cocaine, fourteen rounds of ammunition, a nine millimeter firearm, over eight grams of marijuana, drug trafficking paraphernalia and prescription pills. Sanchez is being held on a half million dollar bail. Sanchez was charged with trafficking cocaine, a school zone violation, possession of a firearm, possession of ammunition and related drug charges. Yasmin Torres has been charged with the same crimes and was released on a low bail.

Drugs, Guns Found At Home Of Southbridge, Massachusetts Man

There are a multitude of defense strategies often associated with these types of cases. For one thing the validity of the search warrant can be challenged through a motion to suppress the search and seizure. If successful all of the items seized pursuant to the search warrant get suppressed and cannot be used as evidence against the defendants. Motions to dismiss work at times as well on cases such as this one. Where there is not telling whose substances these are and it is legally impossible for the district attorney to prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt the case can get dismissed. Trying cases like this one can result in an acquittal also. An Experienced Criminal Defense Lawyer will try to attribute the drugs to the other defendant, particularly if the cases are severed.

Continue Reading

| by

Boston.com reported that two middle aged Massachusetts men are facing possible felony charges after a road rage incident that occurred shortly after six in the morning yesterday. According to the reports William Wilton was driving too slowly by Edward Murphy’s standards. Wilton pulled over to let him pass by however Murphy stopped next to Wilton’s car so that the two could exchange words. So what did Murphy then do? He waived a miniature baseball bat at Wilton in a threatening manner. Wilton then withdrew a firearm and brandished it towards Murphy. Murphy called the police and later gave a statement. Wilton was arrested and found in possession of a firearm that he is licensed to carry. The incident took place in Milton. Both men face charges of assault by means of a dangerous weapon. The case will be prosecuted in the Quincy District Court.

Read Article:

Massachusetts Men Involved In Road Rage Incident Looking At Felony Charges

If this article is accurate and the men did not make incriminating statements this case is a defense attorney’s dream. Both of the men have the right to exercise their Fifth Amendment privileges. That means that neither has to say anything in court. Should they choose to invoke this privilege the prosecution might not be able to prove its case. If charges issue against both of these men I would highly doubt that they would elect to testify against one another. It makes no sense. It is also a risky proposition in that truthful testimony would result in self-incrimination. Do not be surprised to see both of these cases get dismissed.

Continue Reading

| by

Shortly after 12:00 a.m. last Wednesday morning Gabriel Diaz was arrested by the Haverhill, Massachusetts Police Drug Unit. An informant told them that a van would be driving in the High Street area and that it would contain drugs. Using this information the police made the stop of the vehicle. They determined that Diaz did not have a driver’s license. This being an arrestable offense they detained Diaz and searched his car. While doing so they found a cocaine diluting agent, inositol and a scale. Believing that more drugs were present they called in a K-9 unit. The dog sniffed out a hiding compartment in the seat. Inside the police located a loaded nine millimeter handgun, sixty four grams of rock cocaine, nineteen grams of heroin and some cash. Diaz has been charged with trafficking cocaine, trafficking heroin, possession of a firearm, possession of ammunition and more. Charges are now pending in the Haverhill District Court. The case will ultimately be prosecuted in the Essex County Superior Court in Newburyport, Salem or Lawrence.

Drug and Gun Charges Filed Against Lawrence Man Arrested in Haverhill

Here are some things to think about with this case. Anytime police use informants as a basis for stopping a vehicle you can be sure that the defense attorney will move to suppress the stop and search. The police must establish that the information is reliable and the information he supplies must be sufficiently corroborated. Challenging the credibility of his information is a great way to get the search suppressed, the drugs thrown out and the case dismissed. You might also want to think about Diaz’s relationship to the vehicle. Was it his? If not, what evidence is there that he had knowledge about the “secret” compartment in the vehicle. Another question that comes to mind is where was the scale and inositol found? Was it located in plain view such that Diaz must have known it was there or was it secreted in another part of the car.

Continue Reading

| by

Authorities in Hudson, Massachusetts have charged John Resendes with breaking and entering, rape, assault and battery with a dangerous weapon, intimidation of a witness, assault with intent murder, domestic assault and battery, kidnapping and resisting arrest. According to reports at 4:30 in the morning Resendes broke into a woman’s, entered her bedroom and assaulted her. The woman was someone with whom Resendes had a relationship. The possible cause of the incident stems from Resendes seeing her with another man earlier in the day. As the woman tried to escape the attack the defendant threw her to the ground and sexually assaulted her. She was able to call 911. The prosecution further claims that Resendes threatened the victim with a knife by holding it against her throat and suggesting that he would kill her. All charges are now pending in the Marlborough District Court. Resendes is being held without bail. The victim refused medical treatment.

Read Article:

Massachusetts Man Charged With Sexual Assault, Kidnapping

In the context of this case all of these charges are serious. The rape charge itself carries a potential life sentence. Factually however this charge is not supported by this article. To be convicted of rape the district attorney must show that the defendant (Resendes) engaged in sexual intercourse, either natural or unnatural with the complainant; and that the sexual intercourse was accomplished by compelling the complainant to submit by force or threat of bodily injury and against her will. Natural intercourse consists of inserting the penis into the female sex organ. Unnatural sexual intercourse includes oral and anal intercourse, including fellatio and cunnilingus, and other intrusions of a part of a person’s body or other object into the genital or anal opening of another’s body. Either natural or unnatural sexual intercourse is complete on penetration, no matter how slight, of a person’s genital or anal opening. In addition to the vagina, the female genital opening includes the anterior parts known as the vulva and labia. Penetration into the vagina itself is not required. The article makes no mention of what acts Resendes committed to satisfy the elements of the crime of rape.

Continue Reading